Physics and Metaphysics: Only One Reality
Physics and Metaphysics: Only One Reality How do we understand the world? How does the universe run out of the universe? Today, physics and alphabets are two great teachings that provide continuous answers to these outstanding questions. In pursuit of this, physics accept an experimental procedure, while residences take a transfer mechanical procedure. From here, it is clear that although their goals are similar, employees by both the subjects are different from each other. But there are real questions. Which of these fields can be said to provide the world’s proper and unique explanation? Which of these disciplines has been able to provide explanation for the origin of the Universe? Before we delve into this assessment, it is expedient that a concise historical background be given.
Historically speaking, Natural Philosophy, Moral Philosophy and Metaphysics, were the three main branches of General Philosophy. But as the quest for knowledge of the human environment increased, Natural Philosophy and Moral Philosophy broke away from General Philosophy, to form “Natural Science” and “Moral(social) Science”, leaving Metaphysics out in the cold. After that, Natural Science yielded the Physics Sciences, dedicated to providing suitable explanation of the Universe, through empirical observations. Nevertheless, while physics studies the universe empirically, metaphysics studies the universe transcendentally. Here, we define Metaphysics as the going beyond of ‘what is’, to fully understand what ‘what is’ is Although Physics study the fact that outside the physics universe and physics universe really, physics only study the physics universe, so our appreciation is appreciated.
The truth will be said, physics has successfully given the description of physics universe. However, they can not calculate movement and unity in the universe. Clearly, their theory of the earth being made by accident (Big Bang Theory), can not explain how the earth continually rotate on an epicycle round the sun without shifting away, if it was made by accident. Neither can they even account for the origin of giant stars, which periodically explodes in a cosmological event called ‘The Supernova’, that gives birth to the little stars we see up in the sky. At this point their empirical methodology has failed. Obviously, there is a metaphysics force behind all these extraordinary events. For instance, there is a metaphysics explanation as to what sets the Earth in motion, round the sun. After all, “nothing has its own motivation” (includes casting prices). This resignation force, is it necessary to study Tariq? Clearly, the physics universe can only be understood that the facts out of physics universe are first taught. Grappled with this enterprise, what Metaphysicians have been trying to do down the ages, is to postulate several theories explaining the metaphysics reality beyond the universe, so as to fully understand the physics universe. These theories includes; Plato’s theory of Forms, Aristotle’s theory of Pure Being, Leibniz’s theory of Monads, Whitehead’s theory of Actual Entities, and so on. All these theories gives us rational explanations of the reality beyond, so as to fully understand the physics universe. These explanations of a metaphysics reality that governs the physics reality, are what the physics sciences have failed to give us. Finally, just a fact, is just a fair description.